<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.csounion.org">
<channel>
 <title>California Staff Organization  - CSO News</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/20/all</link>
 <description>This section displays all news. To see news
from a particular category only, click on the appropriate subcategory.
</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>CSO 2007 Election results</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1517</link>
 <description>Run-offs to be announced shortly.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/33">Council Actions</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.csounion.org/system/files?file=Ballot Results for 2007l.doc" length="29184" type="application/msword" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:56:20 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CSO Summit</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1502</link>
 <description>Notes from the CSO Summit.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/33">Council Actions</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.csounion.org/system/files?file=CSOsummittnotes.doc" length="19968" type="application/msword" />
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:55:41 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>February 07 President&#039;s message</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1500</link>
 <description>The Collective Bargaining Agreement, Article XIX, Section 19.101 provides for a retirement program that includes a defined benefit retirement pension, defined contribution 401(k) and a defined benefit retirement medical benefit plan. The recent Pension Protection ACT (PPA) of 2006 modified existing funding rules for all multi-employer defined benefit plans and imposes requirements of corrective action for under-funded plans. Under PPA, a multi-employer plan is considered to be endangered status if it is less than 80% funded (or projected within the next six years) with an accumulated funding deficiency.  The implementations of these new requirements is effective in 2008. Required corrective actions are swift and could be an increase in contributions, modifications of the benefit or a combination of both. Let’s be clear about this, the legislation was promoted by the then Republican majority and intended to eliminate workers’ defined pensions. Our current pension plan is not in funding jeopardy to pay out existing and future benefits. We are now being required to have a higher level of funding for the liability.
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/27">President&#039;s Message</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:43:35 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CSO STUFF</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1430</link>
 <description>The CSO Representative Council spent time in July developing and reaffirming the direction of the union. During the September Council Meeting, representatives unanimously voted to commit to an organizing framework that promotes organizing as a culture within CSO. This culture based on the union tenet of relational organizing, will move us in a direction of achieving parity with the employer, while enabling us to deal with priority issues for our members, such as staffing and workload. Council brothers and sisters will be scheduling house meetings in the Fall. These house meetings will be the first step to assess (Plan-Act-Evaluate) our views on what constitutes an organizing culture while revisiting the Core Values and Code of Conduct.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/27">President&#039;s Message</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 12:41:49 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Presidents Message, March 2, 2006</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1418</link>
 <description>On January 31, 2006, Sister Norma Potter was told by the President of CNTA, John Davis, that the Executive Board had a stealth meeting the night before and no longer wanted her assigned to the UniServ. The leadership of CNTA violated every tenet of basic unionism we value and promote on a daily basis. Absent due process or just cause, the local then proceeded to change the locks on the office. This type of egregious behavior would never be tolerated by any self respecting union. CSO moved into action quickly by informing the CNTA membership of their own locals&amp;rsquo; behavior. The actions taken were necessary, not only to share the injustice imposed upon a CSO member, but to send a message to all local UniServs acting in the capacity as management that this type of anti-union behavior will not be tolerated. Our quick steps became even more needed as time passed and CTA did nothing. Ironically, prior to this, both CTA management and leadership approached me to ask what actions CSO was going to take and offered encouragement. In other words, &amp;ldquo;please carry our water&amp;rdquo;.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/27">President&#039;s Message</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:15:05 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Council Actions - March 2, 2006</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1417</link>
 <description> &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt; 	The 	council received the treasurer&amp;rsquo;s report as presented by Felice 	Strauss. Felice noted that the CSO militancy fund is at 32.2% of the 	$1,000,000 goal.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt; 	The 	council approved the selection criteria for CSO sponsored members 	attending the Harvard Trade Union Program. If you are interested in 	attending this program, contact CSO President Tim Hill.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt; 	The 	council approved a resolution in support of the Unite/Here Local 11 	organizing efforts on behalf of hotel workers in the Los Angeles 	airport area.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt; 	The 	council approved funding for a CSO reception for attendees at the 	CTA Hispanic Issues Conference.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt; 	The 	council received a report on the status of the CSO website. The 	website cso-nso.org will be up and running in early March. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; 	 	 	 	 </description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/33">Council Actions</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:13:25 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>February 10, 2006</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1360</link>
 <description>CSO Rep Council members, in conjunction with Organizing Team members, are in the process of conducting a second round of house meetings. Discussion will be around bargaining survey priorities and recent Council action reaffirming the longstanding CSO policy of &amp;ldquo;No Contract, No Work.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; Whether it is three or thirty union members, house meetings have provided the opportunity to participate in meaningful dialogue and debate with their union colleagues. The feedback from these meetings continues to give direction to both the Bargaining Team and the union as a whole. The CSO Annual Meeting, scheduled for March 25-26 in Redondo Beach will also focus on bargaining. Participants will help shape the framework to support the bargaining process. All CSO members are highly encouraged to attend and be part of the building process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Currently, CSO has two grievances at arbitration: one regarding appropriate working conditions (cubicles), and another regarding internal transfer rights. Having been in advocacy work for a long time, I recognize that labor and management must sometimes use the grievance procedure to have a neutral make decisions regarding contract language. What is not acceptable, however, is to abuse the procedure with stall and delay tactics in order to sabotage the&amp;nbsp; end result. CTA is regularly practicing just such tactics through their legal counsel, Larry Steinsapir et al. In both of the pending arbitrations, Steinsapir et al. has used objectionable strategies and challenges to repeatedly delay the hearings, adding more days at additional cost to both parties. Steinsapir&amp;rsquo;s firm is the only winner to date, racking up substantial legal fees. Unfortunately, CTA has failed to direct their counsel to use, rather than abuse the grievance process. In response, the CSO Rep Council voted in November to boycott referring GLS work to Steinsapir and his associates, and encourages all CSO members to do the same whenever possible.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/27">President&#039;s Message</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:51:40 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CTA Membership Expansion Issues</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1300</link>
 <description>At its last meeting, the CTA Board of Directors discussed the potential of expanding CTA membership to include Education Support Personnel. The potential inclusion of ESP into CTA would allow for more aggressive recruitment of charter school units, which typically want to have wall to wall bargaining units. However, the expansion of CTA membership will have significant workload implications for CSO members. You are encouraged to discuss the impact with your CSO representatives and colleagues at your next regional caucus or house meeting. </description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/20">CSO News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:01:30 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Council Notes</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1298</link>
 <description>The Council adopted the 2005-2006 CSO budget as presented by CSO Treasurer, Felice Strauss. A copy of the adopted CSO Budget will be available from Council Reps. at your next caucus meeting.

The Council approved a $500 donation to the NSO Disaster Relief Fund in support of Katrina relief efforts.

The Council approved sending CSO Secretary, Shannon Oâ€™Hara, to the Harvard Trade Union Program. 

The Council approved the appointment of Terry Welborn, Ann Adler, Cheryl Bell and Sam De Haven to a committee charged with reviewing and making recommendations to the Council on the use of sanctions by CSO.

The Council received the CSO grievance report. A copy of this repoprt will be available from Council Reps. at your next caucus meeting.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/33">Council Actions</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:54:03 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CSO Adopts Own $180 Assessment to Fight Gov.</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1366</link>
 <description>As members of the California Staff Organization, we believe that we should put our core union values into action each and every day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We do that in our working lives through our commitment to CTA and its more than 335,000 members, you -- our Partners in Advocacy for public education, human dignity, and workers&amp;rsquo; rights.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We also act in accordance with our values by making financial commitments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At our union&amp;rsquo;s own annual all-member meeting &amp;ndash; held in San Jose in April &amp;ndash; your CSO Partners voted to put our money where our mouths are.&amp;nbsp; CSO union members voted to adopt a recommended $180 contribution over the next three years to be given to CTA for use in fighting Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger&amp;rsquo;s anti-union, anti-public education proposals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We applaud our Partners, CTA members, who are making a similar financial commitment to the fight.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We&amp;rsquo;ve said it&amp;rsquo;s important for a union to know what it stands for &amp;ndash; what its core values are.&amp;nbsp; We&amp;rsquo;ve also said it&amp;rsquo;s not enough for a union just to publish and frame those core values and hang them on the wall. It&amp;rsquo;s vital to put them into action on a daily basis.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/35">Partners in Advocacy</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:58:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Working Together, CTA, CSO, &amp; CAS Mobilize to Defeat Governorâ€™s Anti-education Initiatives</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1365</link>
 <description>&lt;p style=&quot;text-indent: 0.25in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 0.22in&quot;&gt; Dateline, Sacramento &amp;ndash; Working together on short notice, members of CTA, the California Staff Organization, and the California Associate Staff quickly gathered on September 22 in front of CTA&amp;rsquo;s Governmental Relations Office near the Capitol to battle backers of Proposition 75, one of the governor&amp;rsquo;s anti-worker, anti-education ballot measures. Carrying signs and chanting, the union members took on a state senator and representatives of a National Right to Work group that had called a news conference on the sidewalk.  The anti-union group was pushing the CTA-opposed initiative that would undermine union workers&amp;rsquo; ability to speak out on political issues. The action in the state capital is just part of the three unions&amp;rsquo; statewide mobilization that has united labor in a battle to protect public education, health, and safety services.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style=&quot;text-indent: 0.25in; margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 0.22in&quot;&gt;   Dateline, Foster City &amp;ndash; Working together, members of CTA, CSO, and organized labor have filled phone banks at the Region I office to overflowing.  The groups combined a Saturday precinct walk with a celebration of Solidarity recently.  More than 125 union members walked precincts and then gathered for a barbeque featuring a live band.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/20">CSO News</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:54:49 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>October 2005</title>
 <link>http://www.csounion.org/node/1295</link>
 <description>The special election is keeping all of us busy rallying CTA members to fight the Governor&amp;rsquo;s anti-worker/anti-education initiatives. CTA members are unifying around the issues and working together to fight back.&amp;nbsp; Within CSO, we too, must stand united as we move forward in our negotiations with CTA.&amp;nbsp; With both unions&amp;rsquo; contracts set to expire at the same time, CSO and CAS have already developed strategies to demonstrate unity to CTA in our quest to achieve fair contract settlements. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bargaining with CTA will be a test of our union solidarity. We continue to challenge CTA over the transfer article, as it relates to the hiring of internal applicants.&amp;nbsp; CTA has bypassed qualified internal CSO members in order to hire externally. As CSO members, we can&amp;rsquo;t afford to fall into the trap of making this a member vs. member issue. This action creates divisiveness that encourages management. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The real issue is management disregarding the spirit of our collective bargaining agreement. Over the years we have seen a change in the interview process, where management and leadership are not consistent or uniform in application of criteria. We must stand united in challenging these violations of the CBA.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.csounion.org/taxonomy/term/27">President&#039;s Message</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:05:28 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
